School Funding Matters

Giving Ohioans a voice in shaping the future of public education
Welcome to School Funding Matters
Sign in | Join | Help
Nov 06

About those who vote no for schools

Published Thursday, November 06, 2008 5:57 PM by Andy Benson

In the final total, more than 61% of the local school levies passed Tuesday, and nearly 39% of the local school levies failed, which was a new record high of support for the past five years but not as good as a decade ago. More on election results. In a statewide phone survey, we asked Ohio registered voters last month how they voted on local school levies and then asked them what they thought about a number of other education issues. More on poll.

The answers they have were interesting. I was particularly interested in the attitudes and positions of those who say they always or usually vote against local school levies and bond issues in their communities. Only 14% of the respondents said they voted against local school issues, and they tended to be older voters living in urban areas and earning middle-income wages. If they had kids in schools, they were more likely to be in private school than public school.

Here is what they thought about a variety of education issues:

  • Compared to those who always or usually vote for local school issues and those who vote for some local issues, this group of levy opponents tended to be more pessimistic about the direction of the state of Ohio, more pessimistic about the direction of Ohio public education, and more critical of the quality of education in the state and in their communities. For instance, only 32% rated the quality of public education in Ohio as excellent or good, compared to 41% of the levy supporters who gave those ratings. When asked to rate the quality of the schools in their community, only 46% rated them excellent or good compared to nearly 72% of levy supporters.
  • The levy opponents were also more likely to agree that the system of public education makes school districts generally inefficient structures for using and managing tax dollars. Fifty-seven percent agreed that school districts were generally inefficient, compared to 44% of levy supporters.
  • This group is more likely than others to want voters to primarily be making decisions about how much of the annual state budget is allocated for public education and schools. More than 51% expressed this opinion, compared to less than 30% of those who are levy supporters and 44% who vote for some levies.
  • They are less likely to support more state spending on education, less likely to think that the state is spending too little on education, and less likely to support any change in the mix of tax resources to fund schools. For instance, 76% oppose the creation of a statewide property tax for education to increase amount of money for schools and reduce the amount of local levy elections. That is compared to 44% of levy supporters who oppose such a change.

Without more in-depth research, it is hard to know fully what the levy opponents think about the issues, and voters can oppose local issues for many reasons that are unique to their communities and the particular issues. But this preliminary data suggests to me that hard-core levy opponents just don't think their schools and public education in general are doing a very good job and they don't need more money to do better.

That may seem self-evident (the no-brainer, you might say) but this might serve as a good reminder that getting the support of these hard-core opponents lies in convincing them that public education is or will be getting the results that earn their support in the future.

Or, more importantly, earn their tax dollars.

Comments

Paul Lambert said:

School funding in Ohio is a three-way partnership of: a) the residents of the schools districts; b) the businesses in the school district; and, c) a common pool of money redistributed by the State.

School spending in Ohio is all about the salaries and benefits of the teachers, administrators and staff. Nothing else is significant in comparison.

The core problem is that the spending side is growing faster than the revenue side. While few would argue that teachers might have been underpaid in the past, the 'catch-up' process has worked, but is now a cancer accelerating faster than income growth for the other sectors of the economy.

The business sector of Ohio has been in the crapper for a while, and will get worse before it gets better. That means that Ohio businesses are contributing less to their the local districts, and less to the common pool redistributed by the State. Consequently, the size of the pool the State has to distribute is getting smaller as well. Indications are that the state funding to schools will be less in the next budget.

So with two of the three funding sources shrinking, and the expense side growing, the burden is steadily transfering to homeowners in the form of more-frequent and higher-millage local tax levies.

The effect is a steady transfer of wealth from the private sector to public sector workers. Few of us in the private sector even have defined benefit pension plans any more, much less a wage scale that rewards us just for showing up.

SaveHilliardSchools.org took a pro-levy, but no-confidence posture in this election, meaning that we felt we had to pass the levy to keep the current leadership from deeply wounding the district with their threatened (and politically motivated) cuts, but are simultaneously building a slate of candidates for school board with the goal of seating a majority in the Nov 09.

The real problem in America is ignorance and apathy when it comes to the governance of our nation - at all political levels. When the citizens don't care, special interests take over. When you're talking about education in Ohio, that special interest group is the Ohio Education Association - the teachers' union. Their days of 'owning' the statehouse may be coming to an end...

PL

November 7, 2008 3:10 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please Join and/or login to post your comment.
Benson

About the Author

Andy Benson has served as an expert commentator and consultant on school funding cases in Ohio. He is currently director of policy for KnowledgeWorks Foundation, where he leads the education philanthropy's efforts to increase learning opportunities in the state and improve the education system. The foundation spearheads the School Funding Matters initiative and has provided support for improvements in high schools, increased adult workforce training opportunities, creation of P-16 collaboratives, and the encouragement of community engagement in the state.

A decade ago, he was founding president of the New Ohio Institute, a statewide public policy think tank that conducted in-depth studies on education, statewide polls and publications that served as a resource to advocates and policymakers across the state. He holds master's degrees from Harvard University and Ohio State University and a bachelor's degree from Ohio University.

Subscribe

This Week in
School Funding History

May 16, 2003

The Ohio Supreme Court prohibits any further litigation in the DeRolph case.

Links